🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad protest both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in other EU countries